Academic Researcher Profiles

This table summarizes the main features of some tools to create author profiles:

Keep in mind: 

Author profiles are a way to improve your visibility and discoverability:

• to be correctly identified, we suggest you create an ORCID ID
• to tell others what you are working on
• to apply for a job, a grant or to submit a paper to a publisher

Only share information that you can legally disclose to others:

• before choosing an Author profile, check the terms and conditions of use
• before publishing your documents,  check the copyright policies of the publisher using Sherpa.

Be aware of the advantages and disadvantages of each tool:

To choose a researcher profile think about who you want to reach to choose the type of researcher profile you need. To do this, you can ask yourself some questions, like:

• who is the owner of the tool?
• is it open source or commercial? 
• is there any possibility to upload the full text or not?
• does it provide metrics (number of views, downloads, citations, etc)?
• which discipline is most represented
• is there a possibility to auto-update your publication’s list?

Storage and preservation are not always guaranteed overtime.

As the durability of storage is not ensured in the commercial platforms, an alternative is to use our  Institutional repository. If you have a contract with the Geneva Graduate Institute as a researcher and if you want to be sure your publications are preserved, you can send the results of your research to Catherine Brendow who will reference your work on the Institutional Repository. For more information about Institutional Repository, please read this blog post and this guide.

All these tools can be complementary

• instead of choosing only one platform, we suggest you to be active on several of them. 
• if you decide to have many profiles, remember that most of those profiles can be linked together. 
• if you choose to be everywhere, don’t forget to keep your profiles up-to-date so that people can follow your activities.
• you can consider your profiles as a personal brand to communicate about who you are and what you’re working on, but try to be selective in what you put on your profiles.

• Jordan, Katy. “From Social Networks to Publishing Platforms: A Review of the History and Scholarship of Academic Social Network Sites.” Frontiers in Digital Humanities 6 (March 12, 2019): 5.
• Ortega, José Luis. “Disciplinary Differences in the Use of Academic Social Networking Sites.” Online Information Review 39, no. 4 (January 1, 2015): 520–36.
• Ortega, José Luis. “Toward a Homogenization of Academic Social Sites: A Longitudinal Study of Profiles in Academia.Edu, Google Scholar Citations and ResearchGate.” Online Information Review 41, no. 6 (August 25, 2017): 812–25.
• Ovadia, Steven. “ResearchGate and Academia.Edu: Academic Social Networks.” Behavioral & Social Sciences Librarian 33, no. 3 (July 3, 2014): 165–69.
• Shanks, Justin, and Kenning Arlitsch. “Making Sense of Researcher Services.” Journal of Library Administration 56, no. 3 (April 2, 2016): 295–316.
• Williams, Ann E. “Exploring the Utility of Academia.Edu: A SWOT Analysis.” Information and Learning Sciences 119, no. 11 (November 7, 2018): 662–66.
• Williams, Ann E. “Kudos: Bringing Your Publications to Life?” Information and Learning Sciences 118, no. 3/4 (March 13, 2017): 114–19.