The scholar Ilya Shabanov suggests a workflow integrating these new tools:
Inciteful graph
The Open Citations movement has facilitated access to bibliographic metadata. Combined with the advances in artificial intelligence, it has enabled the creation of new search tools.
Literature mapping tools help researchers find articles by exploring connections between publications. Most use one or more 'seed papers' as a starting point. They often use citations (articles citing or cited in the seed papers), or articles that appear in the bibliographies of several papers), algorithms and artificial intelligence. The results are displayed as a map, with the closest articles grouped together.
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Cautious: AI tools "hallucinate" (give false answers that seem credible, especially if you are unfamiliar with the subject) and even make up bibliographic references. They can also be "infected" to spread false narratives.
Here is a selection of tools designed specifically for an academic use.
AI should be your assistant, not your master, always check if the extracted information is correct against the source papers! |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Deep research tools promise better, more comprehensive reports and literature reviews, but they "think" slower, taking minutes rather than seconds to answer. They usually ask you a few questions to better define the purpose of your research. It is an iterative process, they run multiple searches and refine the search by taking into account the results of previous searches. Users can see the different steps of their report generation, and intervene if necessary. Be careful! They can also hallucinate and often go off topic. The sources used are not always academic, and usually limited to open-access articles.
Deep research can be very expensive. Here are some affordable options (and two less affordable) to try. Cross-checking required!